Legal Case Summary
Summary: A legal precedent on contract law, where a reward system was deemed as a valid contract and Mrs Carlill was entitled to the reward.
Facts
In 1891, the Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. started advertising their product, a smoke ball designed to prevent users from contracting influenza. The advertisement offered £100 to any person who used the smoke ball three times daily as directed, and contracted influenza. Mrs Carlill purchased and used the smoke ball as directed but contracted influenza. On the company's refusal to pay the £100, Mrs Carlill brought a lawsuit against the company.
Issues
The main issue in the case was whether the advertisement constituted a contractual offer, and if so, whether Mrs Carlill had accepted the offer through her performance. It raised the question of what constitutes acceptance of an offer and whether performance could be an acceptance. There was also a question as to whether the conditions of the advertisement were satisfied by Mrs Carlill.
Analysis
This landmark decision set a legal precedent in contract law by determining that a reward system can form a contract. The case established that an offer can be made to the world at large; acceptance can be through performance, and it does not always require communication of acceptance to the offeror. The outcome of this case had a profound impact on case law, influencing future cases concerning contract law and establishing the principle of unilateral contracts.
Decision
The Court of Appeal held that the advertisement was an offer made to the entire world and that anyone who performed the conditions of the offer had effectively accepted it. Therefore, Mrs Carlill's use of the smoke ball as directed and subsequent contraction of influenza fulfilled the conditions of the offer, making a binding contract. The company was ordered to pay Mrs Carlill the £100.
References
- Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] 1 QB 256.
- Elliott, C and Quinn, F. (2015). 'Contract Law'. Pearson Education Ltd.
Journalist Brief
In 1891, the Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. advertised a £100 reward to anyone who contracted influenza after using their smoke ball as directed. Mrs Carlill used the product but still got influenza. She sued when the company refused to pay. The court decided that the advertisement was an official offer, and by using the smoke ball as directed, Mrs Carlill had essentially 'accepted' the offer, forming a contract. The company had to pay her the reward money. This case established that a reward system could form a contract and significantly influenced future contract law cases.
FAQs
What is the significance of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.?
Answer: It set a legal precedent in contract law, establishing that a reward system could form a contract, and acceptance can be through performance, not always requiring communication to the offeror.
Did the company have to pay Mrs Carlill?
Answer: Yes, the Court of Appeal held that the company was obligated to pay Mrs Carlill the £100 reward, as she had performed the conditions of the offer.
What is a unilateral contract?
Answer: A unilateral contract is one where only one party makes a promise, usually in return for an act by the other party. In this case, the Carbolic Smoke Ball Co made a promise to pay £100 to anyone who met the conditions of the offer.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below: